An introduction to the comparison of human nature in the works by niccolo machiavelli and thomas mor

The foregoing, I think, is a fair though sketchy presentation of the conception of human nature that finds expression in The Prince. Those regimes which follow the law — although inferior to the untrammeled rule of true philosophers — are far better than those that do not.

This idea that some were good for some things and not for others massively shaped the theories that grew from them. He was, however, more empirical and scientific in his method, writing treatises instead of dialogues and often handling his materials with considerable detachment.

Niccolò Machiavelli

While studying, Thomas Hobbes wondered about why people allow themselves to become ruled by the government and would be the ideal form of government best for England.

The pretext of defending Church interests was used as a partial justification by the Borgias. Such men rarely fail. Normally, these types of works were addressed only to hereditary princes. The two theorists recognize the need for a hierarchical form of government to maintain order; however, they differ in their account of the effect of desires, and emotions on political order and hierarchy.

The result in the Politics is a far-reaching and often penetrating treatment of political life, from the origins and purpose of the state to the nuances of institutional arrangements. This was a classically influenced genre, with models at least as far back as Xenophon and Isocrates.

There, I am warmly welcomed, and I feed on the only food I find nourishing and was born to savour. Machiavelli believed that internal unrest, under certain conditions, can lead to improvements of the institutions that function to check the power of various factions He Niccolo then asserts that through foresight, one can hope to deal with fortuna, and thus maximize one's success.

I am no longer afraid of poverty or frightened of death. Fortune is the quality that cannot be controlled. It order for the sovereign to achieve this goal of keeping the peace, the sovereign must have power to enforce its laws.

In both cases, their works represent a sharp break with the political philosophy of the past and were instrumental in ushering in the age of modern political thought. Even if it is true in Hobbes that the sovereign has no direct duties to its subjects, Hobbes states that the sovereign has obligations to itself to rule according to its own self-preservation.

In keeping with his belief in glory-seeking for its own sake, Machiavelli felt that continued expansion, or the pursuit of empire, was not only a necessary condition for internal political accord but the best way to obtain glory for the ruler, material advantage for the citizenry and to ward off foreign invasion Ibid.

He should question them upon everything, listen to their opinions, and then form his own conclusions.


Along with its theory of private property, the Second Treatise remains the seminal text of classical liberalism. Compare and contrast these, explaining fully your evaluation. The sorry state of Italian politics concerned Machiavelli immensely.

Italy is waiting to see who can be the one to heal her wounds, put and end to the sacking of Lombardy, to extortion in the Kingdom and in Tuscany, and cleanse those sores which have been festering so long.

machiavelli the prince cambridge texts in the history of political thought

He believed that private property was the root of the evil in humans, and the reasons why humans were selfish. For Machiavelli, a truly great prince can never be conventionally religious himself, but he should make his people religious if he can.

But despite its nature, it can be said that when the weather becomes calmer, people can make provisions with defenses and barriers in such a way that if the waters rise again, they may pass away by canal, and their force will not be as out of control or as dangerous.In his introduction to this new translation by Russell Price, Professor Skinner presents a lucid analysis of Machiavelli's text as a response both to the world of Florentine politics, and as an attack on the advice-books for princes published by a number of his contemporaries.

Biography of Niccolo Machiavelli Niccolo Machiavelli was born in Florence, Italy on May 3rd As an Italian historian, statesman, political philosopher, and a diplomat during the renaissance, Machiavelli was a man who lived his life for politics and patriotism. Introduction to the thought of Machiavelli, including discussion of The Prince and The Discourses on Livy.

In the Discourses the subject is republican rather than princely government, and Machiavelli is at home discussing that more popular manner of ruling.

Online Library of Liberty

When human nature is resolved into its constituent parts, the princely and the. - Human Nature in Hobbes and Machiavelli and the use of a Sovereign for Peace or Power The philosophers Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli, both speak of humans in their natural state, and how they are self-centred and greedy.

Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes are important political philosophers of their time. The philosophers share similar negative views on the human nature.

These negative views of human nature are reflected in their views of government, politics, and the treatment of citizens. One of the most important early works dedicated to criticism of Machiavelli, especially The Prince, was that of the Huguenot, Innocent Gentillet, whose work commonly referred to as Discourse against Machiavelli or Anti Machiavel was published in Geneva in

An introduction to the comparison of human nature in the works by niccolo machiavelli and thomas mor
Rated 0/5 based on 26 review